法学

大数据时代被遗忘权的合法性证成

  • 洪丹娜
展开
  • 华南理工大学 法学院, 广东 广州 510006
洪丹娜(1987-),女,博士,讲师,硕士生导师。

收稿日期: 2020-04-22

  网络出版日期: 2021-01-14

基金资助

广东省哲学社会科学“十二五”规划2015年度学科共建项目(GD15XFX10);广州市社科基金项目(2017GZQN23)。

The Justification of Legitimacy of the Right to be Forgotten in the Era of Big Data

  • HONG Dan-na
Expand
  • School of Law, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China

Received date: 2020-04-22

  Online published: 2021-01-14

摘要

被遗忘权在合法性证成上面临着权利正当性基础、权利实现可能性、与其他权利的利益冲突三重诘难。被遗忘权的合法性证成应着力构建层层递进的三阶论证体系。被遗忘权正当性基础的论证应着重考量其意欲守护的价值是否拥有足够的分量去要求重构既有的权利格局。被遗忘权的提出,试图克制信息的过度保存和利用,竭力维护人格尊严和人格利益,具备法定化的正当性基础。被遗忘权的内容设定有助于实现其权利目的,具备实现可能性。被遗忘权与言论自由权、公众知情权之间既存在利益冲突,也有相互促进的一面,其根本原因在于个人信息兼有个人性与公共性的二维属性,因此,对被遗忘权的保护不是绝对的,而是基于与其他权利衡平的结果。

本文引用格式

洪丹娜 . 大数据时代被遗忘权的合法性证成[J]. 华南理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2021 , 23(1) : 73 -83 . DOI: 10.19366/j.cnki.1009-055X.2021.01.008

Abstract

The justification of legitimacy of the right to be forgotten is confronted with three problems:the justification of the right,the possibility to realize the right, and the conflict of the interests between the right to be forgotten and other rights. The justification of legitimacy of the right to be forgotten should focus on building a progressive, three-stage system of argument. And the argument of the justification of the right to be forgotten should focus on considering whether the value it intends to protect has sufficient weight to demand a reconfiguration of the established pattern of rights. The proposal of the right to be forgotten tries to restrain the excessive preservation and use of personal data, and safeguard personal dignity and personal interests, so it has the justification foundation of legalization. The content settings of the right to be forgotten is conducive to the realization of its purpose and has the possibility of realization.Due to the fact that the nature of personal data combines individuality and publicity, there is both conflict of interest and mutual promotion between the right to be forgotten, the freedom of speech and the public's right to know. Therefore, the protection of the right to be forgotten is not absolute, but is based on the equity with other rights.

参考文献

[1] MELVILLE-BROWN A,BURGESS D. The right to be rehabilitated-can you ever escape your past?[J].Entertainment law review, 2003,14(4):88-90.
[2] GRAUX.H, AUSLOOS J, VALCKE P. The Right to be Forgotten in the Internet Era[EB/OL].(2012-11-12)[2019-04-16]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2174896.
[3] WEBER R H. The right to be forgotten:more than a Pandora's Box?[J]. Journal of intellectual property,information technology and electronic commerce law, 2011(2):120-130.
[4] REDING V. Vice-President of the European Commission, EU justice commissioner independent data protection authorities:indispensable watchdogs of the digital age meeting of the article 29 working party brussels (Dec.7, 2011)[EB/OL]. (2011-12-07)[2019-12-12].http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/11/863&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
[5] TASIOULAS J. Human rights, universality and the values of personhood:retracing griffin's steps[J]. European journal of philosophy, 2002, 10(1):79-100.
[6] TASIOULAS J. Taking rights out of human rights[J]. Ethics, 2010, 120(4):647-678.
[7] XANTHOULIS N.Conceptualising a right to oblivion in the digital world:a human rights-based approach[EB/OL].(2012-05-22)[2019-05-16]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2064503.
[8] 郑远民,李志春.被遗忘权的概念分析[J].长春师范大学学报,2015(1):30-34.
[9] 许炳华.被遗忘的权利:比较法之观察[J].东吴法律学报,2015(1):125-163.
[10] 万方.终将被遗忘的权利——我国引入被遗忘权的思考[J].法学评论,2016(6):155-162.
[11] 彭宏洁,柳雁军,李潇璇.告诉你,被遗忘权存在惊天大BUG ![EB/OL].(2016-03-25)[2018-04-15]. https://www.tisi.org/?page_id=7043&post_id=686.
[12] 刘泽刚.过度互联时代被遗忘权保护与自由的代价[J].当代法学,2019(1):91-100.
[13] ROBERT G,LARSON. Forgetting the first amendment:how obscurity-based privacy and a right to be forgotten are incompatible with free speech[J]. Communication law and policy,2013(1):158-171.
[14] 科尔曼.社会理论的基础(上)[M].邓方,译.北京:中国科学文献出版社,1999:65.
[15] 李拥军.论权利的生成[J].学术研究,2005(8):79-83.
[16] 罗浏虎.被遗忘权:搜索引擎上过时个人信息的私法规制[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2016(3):34-43.
[17] 舍恩伯格.删除:大数据取舍之道[M].袁杰,译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:21.
[18] 满洪杰.被遗忘权的解析与构建:作为网络时代信息价值纠偏机制的研究[J].法制与社会发展,2018(2):199-217.
[19] 张桂权.论"人格同一性"——洛克、莱布尼兹、休谟的解释与争论[J].四川大学学报,2011(3):93-100.
[20] BANNON L J. Forgetting as a feature, not a bug:the duality of memory and implication for ubiquitous computing[J]. CoCreation,2006(1):3-15.
[21] 霍文,维克特.信息技术与道德哲学[M].赵迎欢,宋吉鑫,张勤,译.北京:科学出版社,2014:259-262.
[22] 刘雅辉,张铁赢,靳小龙,等.大数据时代的个人隐私保护[J].计算机研究与发展,2015(1):229-247.
[23] 王元卓,靳小龙,程学旗.网络大数据:现状与展望[J].计算机学报,2013(6):1125-1138.
[24] 杨立新,韩煦.被遗忘权的中国本土化及法律适用[J].法律适用,2015(2):24-34.
[25] 秦小建.宪法为何列举权利?——中国宪法权利的规范内涵[J].法制与社会发展, 2014(1):89-100.
[26] 郑志峰.网络社会的被遗忘权研究[J].法商研究,2015(6):50-60.
[27] ZANFIR G.Tracing the right to be forgotten in the short history of data protection law:the "new clothes" of an old right[C]//GUTWIRTHS, LEENES R HERT P. Reforming European data protection law. London:Springer, 2015:227-249.
[28] 刘文杰.被遗忘权:传统元素、新语境与利益衡量[J].法学研究,2018(2):24-41.
[29] 薛丽.GDPR生效背景下我国被遗忘权确立研究[J].法学论坛, 2019(2):100-109.
[30] 廖磊.搜索引擎服务商的个人信息保护义务研究——以被遗忘权为中心[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2017(1):116-125.
[31] 朱新力,周许阳. 大数据时代个人数据利用与保护的均衡——"资源准入模式"之提出[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2018(1):18-34.
[32] 丁晓东.被遗忘权的基本原理与场景化界定[J].清华法学, 2018(6):94-107.
[33] 张新宝.从隐私到个人信息:利益再衡量的理论与制度安排[J].中国法学, 2015(3):38-59.
[34] ROSEN J. The right to be forgotten[J]. Stanford law review online, 2012,64(7):88-92.
[35] 葛维宝.隐私与言论[C]//彭亚楠,译.王利明,葛维宝.中美法学前沿对话——人格权法及侵权法专题研究.北京:中国法制出版社,2006:21-86.
[36] CHANDER A, LE U P.The free speech foundations of cyberlaw[EB/OL].(2013-01-30)[2019-04-16]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2320124.
[37] 蔡培如. 被遗忘权制度的反思与再建构[J].清华法学, 2019(5):168-185.
[38] 范姜真媺.网络时代个人资料保护之强化——被遗忘权之主张[J].兴大法学,2016(19):61-106.
[39] Perott E. French judge establishes prevalence of freedom of the press on Right to be Forgotten[EB/OL].(2016-05-23)[2019-04-15]. https://blog.wan-ifra.org/2016/05/23/french-judge-establishes-prevalence-of-freedom-of-the-press-on-right-to-be-forgotten.
[40] 张慧甄.从被遗忘权看数字记忆时代下因特网个人信息保护[D].台北:台湾大学,2016.
[41] FLORIDI L,KAUFFMAN S, KOLUCKA-ZUK L, et al.The advisory council to google on the right to be forgotten[EB/OL].(2015-02-25)[2019-04-15].http://docs.dpaq.de/8527-report_of_the_advisory_committee_to_google_on_the_right_to_be_forgotten.pdf
[42] 刘利平.大数据时代个人信息被遗忘权法理辨析——基于欧美隐私自主与言论自由博弈视角[J]. 西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(1):58-67.
文章导航

/